Mississippi’s criminal justice reforms work, advocate says. So why does the state keep starting over?
By Len Engel | Originally published by Mississippi Today
Mississippi Today Ideas is a platform for thoughtful Mississippians to share their ideas about our state’s past, present and future. Opinions expressed in guest essays are the author’s own and do not necessarily represent those of Mississippi Today. You can read more about the section here.
Mississippi has repeatedly shown that criminal justice reform can reduce incarceration without undermining public safety — and yet the state keeps reversing course.
Over the past decade, reforms have lowered the prison population and coincided with declining crime, only to be followed by rebounds that return Mississippi to the highest incarceration rate in the nation. Understanding why that pattern persists matters, especially now.
I’ll be direct: I am not from Mississippi. I have worked closely with many of the state’s justice system leaders and frontline workers over the years, but I do not presume to know Mississippi the way those who live and govern here do. What I do bring is decades of experience studying criminal justice systems across the country, including Mississippi as far back as 2013.
A new report from the Crime and Justice Institute, Mississippi by the Numbers, draws on 10 years of state agency data and interviews with judges, attorneys, law enforcement, corrections staff and Mississippians directly impacted by the system. Released as the 2026 legislative session came to a close, the analysis highlights trends that warrant careful attention as policymakers weigh the long-term effects of past reforms — and reversals.
It is well known that Mississippi has the highest incarceration rate in the country. The adult system incarcerates 847 people per 100,000 adults, with only Louisiana approaching that number at 804. The national average is 460 — roughly 60% lower than Mississippi’s rate.
These figures are not abstract. They represent Mississippians with untreated mental illness, people struggling to gain a foothold in the workforce, individuals growing old in prison long past any meaningful public safety benefit, and an aging population whose rising medical costs fall on taxpayers.
What makes these numbers especially important is what decades of research consistently show: Longer prison terms do not reliably produce safer communities. That finding raises two straightforward questions. Why does Mississippi incarcerate so many more people than other states? And why, despite repeated reform efforts, does the state continue to see incarceration levels rebound after periods of measurable progress?
The explanation is multifaceted. Mississippi relies on incarceration for nonviolent offenses at substantially higher rates than the national norm. At the same time, the state has struggled to sustain policy changes designed to reduce that reliance. Neither factor alone tells the whole story, but together they point to a pattern worth taking seriously.
That pattern is visible across the last decade. Comprehensive reforms in 2014 redirected people convicted of lower-level offenses toward supervision, treatment and skill development. The results were notable. The prison population fell 20%, and crime declined alongside it, suggesting that reduced incarceration did not come at the expense of public safety. But the population began to climb again.
In 2019, House Bill 387 curtailed incarceration for unpaid fines and fees, producing another decline that reached a 10-year low in 2021. House Bill 2798 followed that same year. Each reform delivered results, and each was followed by erosion.
Since 2021, Mississippi’s prison population has increased 10%, driven by an 18% rise in admissions and longer sentence lengths, including a 43% increase in sentences exceeding 10 years. The same structural pressures that first pushed Mississippi to the top of national incarceration rankings are once again asserting themselves
The underlying data makes clear where those pressures originate. Nonviolent cases are prevalent at every stage of Mississippi’s justice system. In Mississippi, more than two-thirds of arrests are for low-level offenses while four out of five people in jails are held for nonviolent offenses and over two-thirds of new prison admissions involve nonviolent crimes.
Over the past decade, sentences for nonviolent offenses increased 36%, while sentences for violent offenses decreased 24%. People convicted of nonviolent crimes now serve a larger share of their sentences than before — up 10% — while those convicted of violent crimes are serving less — down 11%.
These trends do not point to a single, easy solution. But they raise an unavoidable question: Is Mississippi using its prison resources in the way most likely to produce long-term public safety?
During the 2026 legislative session, Mississippi lawmakers again demonstrated a willingness to act by passing legislation to strengthen oversight and transparency around deaths in state prison custody. That commitment to accountability matters. But the law does not address who goes to prison, how long they stay or why sentences for nonviolent offenses continue to grow. As in prior cycles, the state has responded to the consequences of system strain without confronting its primary drivers.
Mississippi has already demonstrated that data-guided policies can reduce incarceration while improving public safety. The challenge has never been identifying what works. The state’s own data makes that clear. The challenge has been sustaining those policies through political cycles and resisting reactive responses driven by isolated incidents.
Serious crimes occur in every state regardless of sentence severity. Sustainable public safety is built through consistent, evidence-based practice, not anecdote or political pressure.
With the close of the 2026 legislative session, the question facing Mississippi is no longer whether reform is possible, but whether the state is willing to institutionalize it by addressing sentence length, admissions growth and the long-term use of incarceration for nonviolent conduct.
The data alone cannot make that decision, but it can inform one if policymakers are willing to follow where it leads.
Len Engel, Esq., is director of Policy & Campaigns at the Crime and Justice Institute He brings more than 25 years of experience analyzing criminal justice systems nationwide and has worked closely with state leaders and frontline practitioners to translate data into policy and practice. CJI recently released Mississippi by the Numbers, an analysis of the state’s criminal justice trends over the past decade.
This article was originally published by Mississippi Today and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Source: Original Article





